Razgovor o Wikipediji:Kandidati za brisanje
Short pages
urediHi, you can delete a lot of short pages - look at Posebno:Shortpages. There're pages without even one letter! --Webkid 09:59, 2 Oct 2004 (CEST)
- I don't think we sould delete pages just because they're short or don't have any content. Surely some of them like Kanton X should not be there but others like Klasična Mehanika are perfectly valid and will, no doubt, grow as the number of users on Bs. Wikipedia grows. E.B. 19:59, 2 Oct 2004 (CEST)
- I thought it was natural to delete blank pages. Maybe you'll change your opinion after you get another 30-40 pages - I think this is the reason, and I can understand this. But please tell me if the number of articles has absolutely nothing to do with the opinion you expressed above. --Webkid 16:22, 3 Oct 2004 (CEST)
- Number of articles has absolutely nothing to do with it. As small as it is, bs Wikipedia already counts waaay more articles than it realistically should. What difference would additional 40 "empty" articles make when we have about 480 template articles of years (from 1 - 482) only a fraction of which has some content? Anyway, I don't think that's a really important issue since any article can be recreated at any time. Ultimately, I wouldn't mind deleting those pages. If you wish, add all the empty artiles to the candidates for deletion page and I will not object. E.B.
- While its true that most of those are completely empty, you guys do realize that more than 50% of Serbian, Croatian and many other wikipedia's content is exactly that? Every wikipedia does this in the beginning so I see nothing to be ashamed of.
- I don't mind articles about years. They're very useful, because it's not very convenient to create manually pages about them. But there're 10-15 blank pages which were created for tests only. If one wants to write something, he can always create a new article. --Webkid 23:48, 4 Oct 2004 (CEST)
- While its true that most of those are completely empty, you guys do realize that more than 50% of Serbian, Croatian and many other wikipedia's content is exactly that? Every wikipedia does this in the beginning so I see nothing to be ashamed of.
- Number of articles has absolutely nothing to do with it. As small as it is, bs Wikipedia already counts waaay more articles than it realistically should. What difference would additional 40 "empty" articles make when we have about 480 template articles of years (from 1 - 482) only a fraction of which has some content? Anyway, I don't think that's a really important issue since any article can be recreated at any time. Ultimately, I wouldn't mind deleting those pages. If you wish, add all the empty artiles to the candidates for deletion page and I will not object. E.B.
- I thought it was natural to delete blank pages. Maybe you'll change your opinion after you get another 30-40 pages - I think this is the reason, and I can understand this. But please tell me if the number of articles has absolutely nothing to do with the opinion you expressed above. --Webkid 16:22, 3 Oct 2004 (CEST)
Članci za brzo brisanje
urediApril 2005
urediZapadnohercegovački kanton - nacionalna provokacija + članak bez sadržaja --Bosnawi 10:01, 8 apr 2005 (CEST)
- Članak ispravljen, brisanje više nije potrebno. --Bosnawi 10:03, 15 apr 2005 (CEST)
Havajanski jezik --Bosnawi 10:03, 15 apr 2005 (CEST)
- Izbrisan E.B. 17:58, 27 juli 2005 (CEST)
Istočni blok--Bosnawi 10:03, 15 apr 2005 (CEST)
- Izbrisan E.B. 17:58, 27 juli 2005 (CEST)
Maj 2005
urediViljem-Šekspir Naziv članka nema nikakve veze sa bosanskim pravopisom.--Bosnawi 13:06, 2 maj 2005 (CEST)
- "Viljem-Šekspir" preusmjeren na William Shakespeare. E.B. 18:31, 2 maj 2005 (CEST)
Juli 2005
urediMihail Fradkov Vandalizam
- Izbrisan--Dado 19:38, 27 juli 2005 (CEST)
İstiklâl_Marşı Članak nije uopšte na Bosanskom jeziku. --EmirA 13:55, 11 juli 2005 (CEST)
- Izbrisan --Dado 19:38, 27 juli 2005 (CEST)
Posebno:Shortpages Prvih 100 do 150 clanaka. Ili da ovo postane neciji projekat da dovede u red. Mislim da se ove stranice i ne broje u ukupnom broju clanaka na B. Wiki. --Dado 19:53, 27 juli 2005 (CEST)
Juli 2006
urediJa preuzimam na sebe obavezu brisanja ovih stotinjak nepotrebnih kratkih članaka koje je Dado davno spomenuo. --Emx 11:53, 17 juli 2006 (CEST)
Avgust 2005
urediPrešao sam prvih 100 članaka na Posebno:Shortpages.
Sljedeće članke treba izbrisati zbog toga što
1) Ne sadrže ništa 2) Sadrže komentara koji nemaju ništa sa člankom 3) Ili su bezvrijedni. Npr članak Inka carstvo sadrži tekst Carstvo Inka.
Prepone
Stafete
Supe
Moda
Legenda
Pismo
BH gradovi po gustoći naseljenosti
BH gradovi po površini
Rostilji
Slana jela
Farmakologija i toksikologija
Maltanski jezik
Inka Carstvo
Kratke pruge
Odgoj i obrazovanje
Duge pruge
Diferencijali i Integrali
Srednje pruge
Springfieldu
Ajvatovica
Domobrani
Rekreacija
Tradicije
Branko Damjanac
Husejin Smajlović
Horozović Irfan
Vlade Divac
Vinogorje
Dalje postoji jedan veliki broj praznih članaka sa ličnim imenima kao naslovima. Ja neznam dali te članke treba brisati ili ih ostaviti.
Članak Stari Grad, Sarajevo referira na općinu stari grad, koja već postoji pod općina Stari Grad. Mislim da zbog toga treba i ovaj članak izbrisati.
Düsseldorf. Dali se ovaj grad zove ovako na bosanskom?
1960. Ne sadrži potrebne šablone.
--EmirA 19:24, 30 avgust 2005 (CEST)
Članci koji bi se trebali proširiti a trenutno ne sadrže ništa od važnosti
Emire mozes li jos jednom proci kroz ove clanke. Na nekim sam otkrio da je dovoljno da se preusmjeri na odgovarajuci clanak dok na jednom sam nasao potpun clanak koji je bio izbrisan. Provjeri historije svakog clanka prije nego ga izlistas. Hvala. --Dado 22:26, 30 avgust 2005 (CEST)
Trenutno
urediSeptembar 2011
uredi- Rifat Kačar (Razgovor:Rifat Kačar)
Urađeno 
Dana 13. septembra 2011. u 07:13:41 (CEST/SEV) obrisao administrator i upravnik Toni. Bilješku napisao: -- Bugoslav (razg.), 09:45, 23. septembra 2011. (CEST)
