Razlika između verzija stranice "Razgovor:Doboj"
Uklonjeni sadržaj Dodani sadržaj
No edit summary |
|||
Red 29:
The Chamber concludes that Doboj town was taken over by Serb forces on 3 May 1992. In May and June 1992, Serb authorities in Doboj municipality detained Muslim and Croat civilians in 33 detention centres under cramped and inhumane conditions. The detainees were severely mistreated, and at least one detainee died as a result. Serb authorities restricted the freedom of movement of Muslims and Croats, and Serb paramilitaries terrorized the population in Doboj town. Muslim and Croat monuments were deliberately damaged or destroyed through shelling or explosives. The take-over of Doboj town and the threats and intimidation of Muslims in Doboj prompted many thousands to leave the town for Tešanj.
867. The Chamber finds that some of the crimes described earlier in part 5 meet the requirements of the actus reus for genocide. This is the case with regard to all of the crimes of murder and extermination, described above in part 5.2.2, as well as some instances of cruel or inhumane treatment, discussed above in part 5.4.2. '''The Chamber does not find, however, that any of these acts were committed with the intent to destroy, in part, the Bosnian-Muslim or Bosnian-Croat ethnic group, as such.'''[http://www.un.org/icty/krajisnik/trialc/judgement/kra-jud060927e.pdf]
Ima i o zauzmanju Doboja 3 strane, pa prevedi slobodno. Od riječi do riječi. Možemo i odvojeni i mogo opširniji članak napraviti, što je svakako bolje nego ova što je sada.--[[Korisnik:Dobojlija|Dobojlija]] 22:41, 4 septembar 2007 (CEST)
==Presuda u tužbi BiH protiv Srbije za genocid==
370. In the light of its review of the factual evidence before it of the atrocities committed in
Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1991-1995, the Court has concluded that, '''save for the events of
July 1995 at Srebrenica, the necessary intent required to constitute genocide has not been
conclusively shown in relation to each specific incident.'''
374. Furthermore, and again significantly, the proposition is not consistent with the findings
of the ICTY relating to genocide or with the actions of the Prosecutor, including decisions not to
charge genocide offences in possibly relevant indictments, and to enter into plea agreements, as in the Plavšić and Sikirica et al. cases (IT-00-40 and IT-95-8), '''by which the genocide-related charges were withdrawn.''' [http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/91/13685.pdf?PHPSESSID=1ee483f6c7865070b2b1af6f558ce3cf]--[[Korisnik:Dobojlija|Dobojlija]] 23:25, 4 septembar 2007 (CEST)
==Neutralnost==
| |||